|
Taplin
S, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Fenton JJ, Berns EA, Carney PA, Cutter
GR, Sickles EA, Carl D, Elmore JG. Mammography facility characteristics
associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(12):876-87.
Goldman
LE, Haneuse SJ, Miglioretti DL, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Yankaskas
B, Smith-Bindman R; National Cancer Institute Sponsored Breast
Cancer Surveillance Consortium. An assessment of the quality
of mammography care at facilities treating medically vulnerable
populations. Med Care. 2008;46(7):701-8.
Karliner
LS, Kerlikowske K. Ethnic disparities in breast cancer. Women’s
Health 2007;3:679-68
Bowles
EJ, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Abraham L, Carney PA, Yankaskas
BC, Elmore JG. Accuracy of short-interval follow-up mammograms
by patient and radiologist characteristics. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
2008 May;190(5):1200-8.
Tice
JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, Ichikawa L, Barlow WE, Kerlikowske
K. Breast cancer risk assessment including mammographic breast
density: Development and validation of a new model in an ethnically
diverse cohort. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:337-447
Smith-Bindman
R, Miglioretti DL, Rosenberg RD, Reid RJ, Taplin SH, Geller
BM, Kerlikowske K. Physician workload in mammography. AJR 2008;190:526-53
Hwang
ES, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, Weaver DL, Kerlikowske
K. Breast density predicts subsequent contralateral invasive
disease following treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer
Epidemiol Biomarkers and Prev 2007;16:2587-93
Kerlikowske
K, Miglioretti DL, Buist DSM, Walker R, Carney PA. Declines
in invasive breast cancer and use of postmenopausal hormone
therapy in a screening mammography population. JNCI 2007;99:1335-1339.
jump
to menu
Miglioretti
DL, Smith-Bindman R, Abraham L, Brenner RJ, Carney PA, Bowles
EJ, Buist DS, Elmore JG. Radiologist characteristics associated
with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammography. Natl
Cancer Inst. 2007;99(24):1854-63
Leung
JW, Sickles EA. Developing asymmetry identified on mammography:
correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings. AJR
2007;188:667-75
Kerlikowske
K, Ichikawa L, Miglioretti DL, Buist DSM, Vacek PM, Smith-Bindman
R, Yankaskas BC, Carney PA, Ballard-Barbash R. Longitudinal
measurement of clinical mammographic breast density improves
estimation of breast cancer risk. JNCI 2007;99:386-95
Karliner
LS, Nápoles-Springer A, Kerlikowske K, Haas JS, Kaplan
CP. Missed opportunities: Family history and behavioral risk
factors in breast cancer risk assessment among a multiethnic
group of women. JGIM 2007;22:308-314
Haas
JS, Miglioretti DL, Geller BM, Buist DSM, Nelson DE, Kerlikowske
K, Carney PA, Dash S, Breslau ES, Ballerd-Barbash R. Exposure
to newspaper coverage about the potential harmful effects of
hormone therapy following the women's health initiative and
changes in use. JGIM 2007;22:68-73
jump
to menu
Carney
PA, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Yabroff KR, Sickles EA, Buist
DSM, Kasales CJ, Geller BM, Rosenberg RD, Dignan MB, Weaver
DL, Kerlikowske K. Factors associated with imaging and procedural
events used to detect breast cancer following screening mammography.
AJR 2007;188:385-392
Kerlikowske
K. The mammogram that cried Wolfe. (Editorial) NEJM 2007;356:297-300
Leung
JW, Margolin FR, Dee KE, Jacobs RP, Denny SR, Schrumpf JD. Performance
parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography in a community
practice: are there differences between specialists and general
radiologists? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jan;188(1):236-41.
Rosenberg
RD, Yankaskas B, Abraham L, Sickles EA, ,Lehman C, Geller BM,
Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Buist DSM, Weaver D, Barlow WE, Ballard-Barbash
R. Benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology 2006; 241:55-66
Geller
BM, Ichikawa L, Buist DSM, Sickles EA, Carney PA, Yankaskas
B, Dignan M, Kerlikowske K, Yarbroff R, Barlow WE, Rosenberg
RD. Improving the concordance of mammography assessment and
management recommendations. Radiology 2006; 241:67-75
Barlow
WE, White E, Ballard-Barbash R, Vacek PM, Titus-Ernstoff LT,
Carney PA, Tice JA, Buist D, Geller BM, Rosenberg R, Yankaskas
BC, Kerlikowske K. A prospective breast cancer risk prediction
model among women undergoing screening mammography. JNCI 2006;98:1204-1214
Haas
JS, Geller BM, Miglioretti DL, Buist DSM, Nelso DE, Kerlikowske
K, Carney PA, Breslau ES, Dash S, Canales MK, Ballerd-Barbash
R. Changes in the newspaper coverage of hormone therapy with
the release of new medical evidence. JGIM 2006;21:304-309
Shepherd
JA, Herve L, Landau J, Fan B, Kerlikowske K, Cummings SR. Comparison
of mammographic breast density to a novel DXA technique. Medical
Physics 2006;33:1490-98
jump
to menu
Smith-Bindman
R, Quale C, Chu PW, Rosenberg RD, Kerlikowske K. Can Medicare
billing claims data be used to assess mammography utilization
among women aged 65 and older. Medical Care 2006;44:463-70
Smith-Bindman
R, Miglioretti DL, Lurie N, Abraham L, Ballard-Barbash R, Strzelczyk
J, Dignan M
Barlow WE, Beasley CM, Kerlikowske K. Does utilization of screening
mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast
cancer? Ann Intern Med 2006;144:541-553
Weaver
DL, Rosenberg RD, Barlow WE, Ichikawa L, Carney PA, Kerlikowske
K, Buist DSM, Geller BM, Key CR, Maygarden SJ. Ballard-Barbash
R. Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium:
population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening
mammography. Cancer 2006;106:732-742
Kaplan
CP, Haas JS, Perez-Stable EJ, Somkin C, Gregorich S, Des Jarlais
G, Kerlikowske K. Breast cancer risk reduction options: awareness,
discussion, and use among women from four ethnic groups. Cancer
Epidemiol Biomarkers and Prev 2006;15:162-166
Haas
JS, Kaplan CP, Des Jarlais G, Gildengoin V, Perez-Stable EJ,
Kerlikowske K. Perceived risk of breast cancer among women at
average and increased risk. J Women's Health 2005;14:845-51
Tice
JA, Cummings SR, Ziv E, Kerlikowske K. Mammographic breast density
and breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population.
Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005;94:155-122
Des
Jarlais G, Kaplan CP, Haas JS, Gregorich S, Perez-Stable EJ,
Kerlikowske K. Factors Affecting participation in a telephone
survey among women from four racial/ethnic groups. Prev Med
2005;41:720-727
jump
to menu
Kerlikowske
K, Creasman J, Leung J, Smith-Bindman R, Ernster VL. Differences
in screening mammography outcomes among white and Asian women.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1862-68
Haas
JS, Kaplan CP, Brawarsky P, Kerlikowske K. Evaluation and outcomes
of women with a breast lump and normal mammogram results. JGIM
2005;20:692-696
Sickles
EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, Geller BM, Leung JWT,
Rosenberg RD, Smith-Bindman R, Yankaskas BC. Performance benchmarks
for diagnostic mammography. Radiology 2005;235:775-790
Shepherd
JA, Herve L, Landau J, Fan B, Kerlikowske K, Cummings SR. Novel
use of single x-ray absorptiometry for measuring breast density.
Technol Cancer Res Treat 2005;4:173-82
Smith-Bindman
R, Ballard-Barbash R, Patnick J, Kerlikowske K. Comparing the
performance of mammography screening mammography in the United
States and the United Kingdom. J Med Screen 2005;12:50-54
Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Quale C, Miglioretti DL Rosenberg RD,
Cutter G, Geller B, Bacchettii P, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K.
Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy. JNCI 2005;97:358-67
Kerlikowske
K, Shepherd J, Creasman J, Tice JA, Ziv E, Cummings SR. Are
breast density and bone mineral density independent risk factors
for breast cancer? JNCI 2005;97:368-74
Yankaskas
BC, Taplin SH, Ichikawa L, Geller BM, Rosenberg R, Carney PA,
Kerlikowske K, Ballard-Barbash R, Cutter G, Barlow WE. Association
between mammography timing and measures of screening performance
in the U.S. Radiology 2005;234:363-373
Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Lynn A, Lehman C, Yankaskas
BC, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Voeks J, Geller BM, Carney
PA, Yankaskas BC, Sickles EA. Breast cancer yield for screening
mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval
follow-up. Radiology 2005;234:684-692
jump
to menu
White
E, Miglioretti D, Yankaskas BC, Geller BM, Rosenberg RD, Kerlikowske
K, Saba L, Vacek PM, Carney PA, Buist DS, Oestricher N, Barlow
W, Ballard-Barbash R, Taplin SH. Biennial versus annual mammography
and the risk of late-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst
2004 Dec 15;96(24):1832-9.
Ziv
E, Tice J, Smith-Bindman R, Shepherd JA, Cummings SR, Kerlikowske
K. Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast
cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers and Prev 2004;13:2090-2095
Miglioretti
DL, Rutter CM, Geller BM, Cutter G, Barlow WE, Rosenberg R,
Weaver DL, Taplin SH, Ballard-Barbash R, Carney PA, Yankaskas
BC, Kerlikowske K. Effect of breast augmentation on the accuracy
of mammography and cancer characteristics. JAMA. 2004;291:442-450.
Haas JS, Kaplan CP, Gerstenberger EP, Kerlikowske K. Changes
in the Use of Post-Menopausal Hormone Therapy with the Publication
of Clinical Trial Results. Ann Intern Med, 2004;140:184-8.
Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, Sickles
EA, Blanks R, Ballard-Barbash R, Bobo JK, Lee NC, Wallis MG,
Patnick J, Kerlikowske K. Comparison of screening mammography
in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA 2003;290:2129-2137
Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Ljung Britt-Marie, Grady D.
Evaluation of abnormal mammography examinations and palpable
breast abnormalities. Ann Intern Med, 2003;139: 274-284
Ziv E, Shepherd JA, Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske
K. Mammographic breast density and family history of breast
cancer. JNCI 2003;95:556-558.
Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash
R, Weaver DL, Buist DSM, Barlow WE, Cutter G, Geller BM, Yankaskas
B, Taplin, SH, Carney PA. Prognostic characteristics of breast
cancer among postmenopausal hormone users in a screened population.
JCO 2003;21:4314-4321
Kerlikowske K, Molinaro A, Cha I, Ljung BM,
Ernster VL, Stewart K, Chew K, Moore DH, Waldman F. Characteristics
associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma
in situ treated by lumpectomy. JNCI 2003;95:1692-1702
jump
to menu
Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Sickles EA.
Short-interval follow-up mammography: Are we doing the right
thing? (editorial) JNCI 2003;95:418-419.
Geller, BM, Kerlikowske K, Carney PA, Abraham
LA, Yankaskas BC, Taplin SH, Ballard-Barbash R, Dignan MB, Rosenberg
R, Urban N, Barlow WE. Mammography surveillance following breast
cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2003;81:107-115.
Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas B, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg
R, Rutter C, Geller, BM, Abraham LA, Dignan MB, Cutter G, Ballard-Barbash
R. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density and
hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening
mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:168-75
Burnside E, Sickles EA, Sohlich R, Dee KE. The
differential value of comparison with previous examinations
in diagnostic versus screening mammography. AJR 2002;179:1173-7.
Geller B, Barlow WE, Ballard-Barbash R, Ernster
V, Yankaskas B, Sickles EA, Carney PA, Dignan MB, Rosenberg
R, Urban N, Zheng Y, Taplin SH. Use of the American College
of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation
of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease. Radiology
2002;222:536-42.
Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng
Y, Weaver D, Cutter G, Yankaskas B, Rosenberg R, Carney PA,
Kerlikowske K, Taplin S, Urban N, Geller B. Detection of DCIS
in women undergoing screening mammography. JNCI. 2002;94:1546-54
jump
to menu
Prevrhal S., Shepherd JA, Smith-Bindman R, Cummings
SR, Kerlikowske K. Accuracy of mammographic breast density analysis:
results of formal operator training. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers
and Prevention. 2002;11:1389-1393
Barlow WE, Lehman CD, Zheng Y, Ballard-Barbash
R, Yankaskas B, Cutter G, Carney PA, Geller BM, Rosenberg, R,
Kerlikowske K, Weaver D, Taplin SH. Performance of diagnostic
mammography for women with breast signs or symptoms. JNCI. 2002;94:1151-1159.
Shepherd JA, Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R,
Genant HK, Cummings SR. Can dual X-ray absorptiometry accurately
and precisely measure breast density? Radiology. 2002;223:554-557.
Taplin S, Ichikawa L, Kerlikowske K, Ernster
V, Rosenberg R, Yankaskas B, Carney P, Geller B, Urban N, Dignan
M, Ballard-Barbash R, Sickles
EA. Concordance of Breast Imaging
Reporting and Data System assessments and management recommendations
in screening mammography. Radiology 2002;222:529-35.
Sickles EA, Wolverton DE, Dee KE. Performance
parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist
and general radiologists. Radiology 2002; 224:861-869.
Sohlich R, Sickles EA, Burnside E, Dee KE Interpreting
data from audits when screening and diagnostic mammography outcomes
are combined. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Mar;178(3):681-6.
Dee KE, Sickles EA. Medical audit of diagnostic
mammography examinations: comparison with screening outcomes
obtained concurrently. AJR 2001;176(3):729-33.
Haas J, Kaplan C, McMillan A, Esserman L. Does
Timely Assessment Affect the Anxiety Associated with an Abnormal
Mammogram Assessment? J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2001;10:599-606
jump
to menu
Ernster V, Barclay JB, Kerlikowske K, Wilkie
H, Ballard-Barbash R. Mortality Among Women with Ductal Carcinoma
In Situ of the Breast in the Population-based Surveillance,
Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Arch Intern Med 2000;160(7):953-8.
Haas JS, Cook EF, Puopolo AL, Burstin HR, Brennan
TA. Differences in the Quality of Care for Women with an Abnormal
Mammogram or Breast Complaint [see comments]. J Gen Intern Med
2000;15(5):321-8
Margolin FR, Leung J, Jacobs RP, Denny SR. Percutaneous
imaging-guided core breast biopsy: 5 years' experience in a
community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:559-64.
Hunt KA, Sickles EA. Effect of Obesity on Screening
Mammography: Outcomes Analysis of 88,346 Consecutive Examinations.
AJR 2000;174(5):1251-5.
Kerlikowske K. Breast Cancer Screening. In Women
and Health. San Diego: Academic Press, 2000.
Kerlikowske K, Ernster VL. Women Should Be Fully
Informed of the Potential Benefits and Harms Before Screening
Mammography. West J Med 2000;173:313-14.
Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, Barclay J,
Schwerin EH, Sickles EA, Hylton NM. Dynamic High-spatial-resolution
MR Imaging of Suspicious Breast Lesions: Diagnostic Criteria
and Interobserver Variability. AJR 2000;175(1):35-43.
Leung JW, Sickles EA. Multiple Bilateral Masses
Detected on Screening Mammography: Assessment of Need for Recall
Imaging. AJR 2000;175(1):23-9.
jump
to menu
Pearson KL, Sickles EA, Frankel SD, Leung JW.
Efficacy of Step-oblique Mammography for Confirmation and Localization
of Densities Seen on Only One Standard Mammographic View. AJR
2000;174(3):745-52.
Kerlikowske K, Carney P, Geller B, Mandelson
MT, Taplin S, Malvin K, Ernster V, Urban N, Cutter G, Rosenberg
R, Ballard-Barbash R. Performance of screening mammography among
women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer.
Ann Intern Med 2000;133:855-863
Sickles EA. Successful Methods to Reduce False-positive
Mammography Interpretations. Radiol Clin North Am 2000;38(4):693-700.
Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Gebretsadik
T, Newman J. Is Screening Mammography Effective in Elderly Women?
Am J Med 2000;108(2):112-19.
Waldman FM, DeVries S, Chew K, Moore D, Kerlikowske
K, Ljung BM. Chromosomal Alterations of Ductal Carcinomas In
Situ and Their In Situ Recurrences. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:313-20.
Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ, Feig
SA, Kopans DB, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA, Tabar L, Vyborny
CJ, Castellino RA. Potential Contribution of Computer-aided
Detection to the Sensitivity of Screening Mammography. Radiology
2000;215(2):554-62.
Ernster VL. Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women
with a High Risk of Breast Cancer [letter; comment]. N Engl
J Med 1999;340(23):1838; discussion 1839.
jump
to menu
Ernster V, Kerlikowske K. Breast Cancer Screening.
Lancet 1999;354:947.
Hunt KA, Rosen EL, Sickles EA. Outcome Analysis
for Women Undergoing Annual Versus Biennial Screening Mammography:
a Review of 24,211 Examinations. AJR 1999;173:285-9.
Kerlikowske K. Mammograms. In Encarta Encyclopedia.
Redmond: Microsoft, 1999.
Kerlikowske K, Salzmann P, Phillips KA, Cauley
JA, Cummings SR. Continuing Screening Mammography in Women Aged
70 to 79 Years Impact on Life Expectancy and Cost-effectiveness.
J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:2156-63.
Rosen EL, Sickles E, Keating D. Ability of Mammography
to Reveal Nonpalpable Breast Cancer in Women with Palpable Breast
Masses. AJR 1999;172:309-12.
Sickles EA, Rubin E. Probably Benign Breast
Lesions: When Should Follow-up be Recommended and What is the
Optimal Follow-up Protocol? Editorial. Radiology 1999;213:11-12.
Ernster VL. Ernster Responds (Invited reply
to commentary). Am J Public Health 1998;88:834-5.
Ernster VL. Ernster Replies (letter). Am J Public
Health 1998;88:841-2.
Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Frankel S,
Ominsky S, Sickles E, Ernster V. Variability and Accuracy in
Mammographic Interpretation Using the American College of Radiology
Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst
1998;90:1801-9.
jump
to menu
Phillips KA, Kerlikowske K, Baker LC, Chang
SW, Brown ML. Factors Associated with Women's Adherence to Mammography
Screening Guidelines. Health Serv Res 1998;33:29-53.
Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K. Is There a Downside
to Elderly Women Undergoing Screening Mammography? J Natl Cancer
Inst 1998;90:1322-3.
Ernster VL, Barclay J. Increases in Ductal Carcinoma
in Situ (Dcis) of the Breast in Relation to Mammography: a Dilemma.
Monographs J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;22:151-6.
Ernster VL. Mammography Screening for Women
Aged 40 Through 49--a Guidelines Saga and a Clarion Call for
Informed Decision Making. Am J Public Health 1997;87:1103-6.
Ernster V. Epidemiology and Natural History
of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. In M. Silverstein (ed.) Ductal
Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast. Williams & Wilkins, 1997;23-33.
Kerlikowske KM. Efficacy of Screening Mammography:
Relative and Absolute Benefit. Monographs J Natl Cancer Inst
1997;22:79-86.
Kerlikowske KM, Barclay J. Outcomes of Modern
Screening Mammography. Monographs J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;22:105-11.
Kerlikowske K, Barclay J, Grady D, Sickles EA,
and Ernster V. Comparison of Risk Factors for Ductal Carcinoma
In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:76-82.
jump
to menu
Salzmann P, Kerlikowske K, Phillips K. Cost-effectiveness
of Extending Screening Mammography Programs to Include Women
40-49. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:955-65.
Sickles EA. Breast Cancer Screening Outcomes
in Women Ages 40-49: Clinical Experience with Service Screening
Using Modern Mammography. Monographs Natl Cancer Inst 1997;22:99-104.
Ernster VL. Screening Mammography for Women
under 50: Considerations for Fully Informed Decision Making.
Women's Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy 1996;2:255-8.
Ernster VL, Kerlikowske. Detection and Treatment
of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast (letter). J Am Med
Assoc 1996;276:870-1.
Ernster VL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Grady
D, Henderson, Ic. Incidence and Treatment for Ductal Carcinoma
In Situ of the Breast in the United States. J Am Med Assoc 1996;275:913-18.
Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA,
Ernster V. Effect of Age, Breast Density, and Family History
on the Sensitivity of First Screening Mammography? J Am Med
Assoc 1996;276:33-8.
Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA,
Ernster V. Likelihood Ratios for Modern Screening Mammography.
J Am Med Assoc 1996;276:39-43.
Kerlikowske K. Timeliness of Follow-up after
Abnormal Screening Mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996;40:53-64.
jump
to menu
Wolverton DE, Sickles EA. Clinical Outcome of
Doubtful Mammographic Findings. AJR 1996;167:1041-5.
Brown ML, Houn F, Sickles EA, Kessler LG. Screening
Mammography in Community Practice: Positive Predictive Value
of Abnormal Findings and Yield of Follow-up Diagnostic Procedures.
AJR 1995;165:1373-7.
Curpen BN, Sickles EA, Sollitto RA, Ominsky
SH, Galvin HB, Frankel SD. The Comparative Value of Mammographic
Screening for Women 40-49 Years Old Versus Women 50-64 Years
Old. AJR 1995;164:1099-1103.
Faulk RM, Sickles EA, Sollitto RA, Ominsky SH,
Galvin HB, Frankel SD. Clinical Efficacy of Mammographic Screening
in the Elderly. Radiology 1995;194:193-7.
Frankel SD, Sickles EA, Curpen BN, Sollitto
RA, Ominsky SH, Galvin HB. Initial Versus Subsequent Screening
Mammography: Comparison of Findings and their Prognostic Significance.
AJR 1995;164:1107-9.
Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Ernster V. Benefit of
Mammography Screening in Women Ages 40-49 Years: Current Evidence
from Randomized Controlled Trials [letter]. Cancer 1995;76(9):1679-81.
Sickles EA. Management of Probably Benign Breast
Legions. Radiol Clin North Am 1995;33:1123-30.
|
